Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Lazar v. Gobron et al
as 7:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Peter Lazar
Defendant:
John Gobron, Safedose, Inc., Dominic Bagnoli, Jr. MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
US v. Tyrone Davis
as 22-4709
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE ROSWELL DAVIS, a/k/a Bloody Tye, a/k/a Turtle
US v. Tye Sarratt
as 22-6335
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYE LANFORD SARRATT
Tye v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00138
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Tye
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Schuring
as 6:2020cv02898
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams
Defendant:
Tye Edward Schuring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Tye Sarratt
as 19-6075
Defendant / Appellant:
TYE LANFORD SARRATT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.19 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0340000001810, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 1 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK B, BLOCK D, et al
as 2:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.19 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0340000001810, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 1 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK B, BLOCK D, et al and Thomas M. Tye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Big Red Box LLC v. Square Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00758
Plaintiff:
Big Red Box LLC
Defendant:
Square Inc , American Express Company, William Tye Grisel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sarratt v. USA
as 3:2016cv00365
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tye Lanford Sarratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Devlin v. Davis et al
as 8:2016cv01024
Plaintiff:
James L Devlin
Defendant:
Tye Nalley and Noe Sudduth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
