Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Gonzalez-Valdez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Uvaldo Gonzalez-Valdez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Humberto Pineda Valdez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2010
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO ISRAEL PINEDA VALDEZ and HUMBERTO PINEDA CUELLAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Valdez v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00258
Petitioner:
Juan Valdez
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02841
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
