Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
as 24-6377
Petitioner:
LARRY BLAKNEY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S. and WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Dingle, Jr. v. Palmer et al
as 9:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Henry O'Neal Dingle, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer and Associate Warden Thomas Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Futrell v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02258
Petitioner:
Jule C. Futrell
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Theodore Carrington, Jr. v. Thomas Scarantino
as 23-7060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Gash v. Thomas et al
as 9:2023cv04168
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Lamar Gash
Defendant:
Ass. Warden Thomas, Cpt. Gregg, Cpt. McPhaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FUTRELL v. SCARANTINO
as 1:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
JULE C. FUTRELL
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carrington v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03182
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Medical Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rios v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02108
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Park v. Scarantino
as 5:2023ct03137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Park
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00879
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
