Cases 1 - 10 of 2,815
Willie McKinnon v. Angela Talley
as 24-6485
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON
Defendant:
ANGELA TALLEY, Montgomery County Correctional Facility Director, WARDEN SUSAN MALAGARI, DEPUTY WARDEN GILLIAM and others
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Willis et al
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Lamar McGill
Defendant:
Kevin Jeffrey Willis and Charleston County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Byrd v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Willie Mai Byrd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Coffie v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01650
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Coffie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
