Cases 1 - 10 of 2,815
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie McKinnon v. Angela Talley
as 24-6485
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ORLANDO MCKINNON
Defendant:
ANGELA TALLEY, Montgomery County Correctional Facility Director, WARDEN SUSAN MALAGARI, DEPUTY WARDEN GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
McGill v. Willis et al
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Lamar McGill
Defendant:
Kevin Jeffrey Willis and Charleston County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Byrd v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Willie Mai Byrd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
