Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Tracey Edwards v. Benita Witherspoon
as 24-7049
Defendant:
JAMES ALEXANDER, SHEIDA BRODIE, KAVONA GILL and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY EDWARDS
Misanin et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv04734
Defendant:
William H. Bingham, Sr., South Carolina Public Employee Benefit Authority, Thomas L. Stephenson and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Noe, Grant Goe, Nina Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover et al v. RDU Airport Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Theressa Glover and Guillermo Maldonado-Sanchez
Defendant:
RDU Airport Authority, David Witherspoon, Chris Slavik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Witherspoon v. Witherspoon
as 1:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
Marcus Witherspoon
Defendant:
Anita Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Witherspoon et al v. State Employees Credit Union
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Rodney H Witherspoon and Salimah Hanan El-Amin
Defendant:
State Employees Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Donald Ray Witherspoon et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01550
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Witherspoon and Judy Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
