Cases 1 - 10 of 944
NEAWEDDE v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
KAREN NEAWEDDE
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and DEREK HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Marquita Hagins v. Shannon Mitchell et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Marquita Hagins
Defendant:
Shannon Mitchell and Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Grauvogl et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD GRAUVOGL and SUMMER R. GRAUVOGL
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rexit Holdings LLC v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 5:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Rexit Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Turner v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10913
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
DUNSTON v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
LOGAN M DUNSTON
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Windham v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Jon Windham
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC and WSFS Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
