Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Mitchell v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2013cv00138
Petitioner:
Charles Hensley Mitchell
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hensley v. Chaffin et al
as 3:2013cv00280
Defendant:
Unknown Chaffin and Unknown Perkins
Plaintiff:
Donald Hensley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Hensley, Jr. v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 12-30945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HENSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LANDRY, Lieutenant, DIXON, Captain (now a Major) and JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Medical Director
Tracy Rhine v. City of Mansfield, et al
as 12-10485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY JO RHINE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MANSFIELD, MANSFIELD MARSHALS, LIEUTENANT WILSON and others
Shelby Fife v. Hensley, et al
as 11-10989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELBY W FIFE
Defendant - Appellee:
HENSLEY, Health and Medical Administrator, SHANE MARTINEZ, Health and Medical Administrator and BEN LUONG, Physician-Medical Director, Preston E. Smith Unit
Shaw v. Agricola et al
as 1:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Johnny Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Agricola, Amanda Hensley, Prasad Surapaneni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hensley v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00094
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Hensley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhine v. City of Mansfield et al
as 4:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jo Rhine
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Mansfield Marshals, Cpl. Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salcido v. Womble et al
as 1:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Armando Salcido
Defendant:
John Carl Womble, UP, UP Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summerall v. Hensley et al
as 2:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Shauntell Maurice Summerall
Defendant:
Christopher Hensley, Michael Walker and Forrest County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
