Cases 21 - 30 of 932
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 24-30049
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Primus v. Paretti et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Primus
Defendant:
Captain Paretti, Lieutenant Moore, Sergeant Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Rayburn Correctional
as 24-30025
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Major Johnson, Lieutenant Henry and others
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Hulsey v. Bishop
as 24-10014
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hulsey
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Sheriif, Taylor County Sheriff's Office, Andre Moore, Lieutenant, Taylor County Detention Center, N Wade and others
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Rodgers v. Edwards
as 23-30922
Plaintiff:
Gary Daniel Rodgers
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Louisiana Governor, James Lablanc, Secretary of the State, Mayor of New Roads and others
Jarrow v. Orr
as 23-11195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Jarrow
Defendant / Appellee:
Heath H Orr, Lieutenant of Correctional Officers
Moore v. McFarling, et al.
as 4:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Henry Moore
Defendant:
Judge FNU McFarling, Dr Kristi Compton, Dr FNU Goodness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
