Cases 31 - 40 of 1,625
King v. Doe
as 3:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
Joshua King
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hutson et al
as 2:2023cv06857
Plaintiff:
Kenshawn G King and Kenshawn Gavin King
Defendant:
Susan Hutson and Deshawn Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iribhogbe v. King et al
as 4:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Edgal Iribhogbe
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, FNU LNU, Captain FNU Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinson v. King et al
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
Kim King, ., Corr Health and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenear v. Deputy A. Beal et al
as 4:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Dakari J. Lenear
Defendant:
Deputy A. Beal, Deputy M. Quintanilla, Deputy J. Reinert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuelson v. King et al
as 4:2023cv01034
Petitioner:
Michael D. Samuelson and Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
FNU King, Rene Hinojosa, Alma Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
Ronald King, Warden Jackson, Warden Vigliate and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. King
as 23-10930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher T. King
Dickerson v. King
as 23-60535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Ron King and Warden Donald Jackson
Griffin v. Vital Care Health Provider et al
as 3:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Generial Griffin
Defendant:
Vital Care Health Provider
Interested Party:
Adam King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
