Cases 41 - 50 of 3,726
v. Simply 180, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv61740
Defendant:
Simply 180, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Simply 180 Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 0:2024cv61741
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Simply 180 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Simply180, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 0:2024cv61743
Plaintiff:
Simply180, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Walker Products Inc. v. Cong et al
as 2:2024mc00373
Defendant:
Yue (Frank) Cong and All Automotive Megahub, Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walker Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Doe v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 2:2024cv07881
Defendant:
Prime Communications LP and AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wallace v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2024cv02330
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Plaintiff:
Cindy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01468
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Olvin Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) - FLSA: Minimum Wage or Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
GAINES v. T-MOBILE et al
as 1:2024cv01552
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR CAR DEALERSHIP, IN ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT., HUNNIGTON BANK and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS B. GAINES
Cross-Defendant:
1,000 MILES AWAY DIGITAL SCIENTORS WITH THE DIGITAL MANIPULATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
