Cases 51 - 60 of 6,236
Ducksworth v. USA
as 2:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Ducksworth
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huglon v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
S L Huglon
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Houston District System of Texas, Jennifer Meriwether and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Matthews
as 24-40207
Plaintiff:
DeVon Sean Strong
Defendant:
Hillary R. Matthews, Mohamed L. Touchami, Patrick D. Coleman and others
Couvillion v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Reed Couvillion
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, III and L. Preatto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Biden, O L Luther and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero-Bonilla v. Ping
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Romero Ronilla and Jose J. Romero-Bonilla
Defendant:
Warden L. Ping
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Chevalier, Jailyn LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
