Cases 61 - 70 of 4,895
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00899
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00905
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00909
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Kemp v. Shreveport PD
as 24-30134
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Department, Ross Owens, R. Lee Irvin, Judge and others
Pena v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Francisco Andricks Pena
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. UTMB John Sealy Galveston et al
as 4:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Willie T Washington
Defendant:
UTMB John Sealy Galveston and Doctor C. D. Kosarek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Colbert et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Lee Baker
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Colbert, Unknown Chambers, Dr., A.W. Ping and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
