Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Cowart v. USA
as 4:2016cv00364
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Chase Cowart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cowart v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00352
Movant:
Chase Cowart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Courville v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Chase M Courville
Defendant:
Smith, Bass and Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courville v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv00268
Defendant:
Unknown Bass, Unknown Smith and Unknown Walker
Plaintiff:
Chase M. Courville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Harris et al
as 5:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Andrew Harris, CITI-Group Bank, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas - Wichita Falls Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Fisher
as 3:2015cv00799
Petitioner:
Ricky R. Chase
Respondent:
Marshall L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burson v. Blackman
as 3:2015cv00752
Petitioner:
Chase Burson
Respondent:
Blackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Jordan, et al v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 15-60604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD JORDAN and RICKY CHASE
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMISSIONER MARSHALL L. FISHER, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, in his Official Capacity, SUPERINTENDENT EARNEST LEE, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, in his Official Capacity, MISSISSIPPI STATE EXECUTIONER, In his Official Capacity and others
Jordan et al v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher , Earnest Lee , The Mississippi State Executioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Picayune Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Zetrick Greer
Defendant:
Picayune Police Department and Chase Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
