Cases 161 - 170 of 294
Bank of America NA v. Garden District Pet Hospital, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01386
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Garden District Pet Hospital, Inc., French Quarter Vet, Inc and Scott Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01282
Petitioner:
Dennis Griffith
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffith v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01321
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00298
Defendant:
Lisa David, John Bradley, Nick Richter and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Griffith v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00317
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffith
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas , Charlie Parker , Kathryn Wilemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacob Griffith v. Timothy Keith, Warden
as 14-31365
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACOB RAY GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY KEITH, Warden, Winn Correctional Center
Griffith v. Denmark et al
as 2:2014cv00187
Plaintiff:
Antonio Griffith
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kroll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03955
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kroll , Mary Kathleen Katchur , Kathy Donald and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Petitioner:
Martha Harp and Patsy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
