Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Hooks v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooks
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Scott DeLeerda and John . Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moon v. Olivarez
as 21-50193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Lee Moon
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, City of El Paso, Sergio Reyes and others
Davis v. City of Andrews
as 20-50951
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Delacruz and City of Andrews, Texas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Davis
Foote v. Car Protection USA et al
as 3:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Car Protection USA, Matrix Warranty Solutions Inc and John Davis
Plaintiff:
Paula Foote
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
John Lansdell v. Lee Miller, et al
as 20-60143
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MILLER, In His Individual Capacity and LEE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVIS LANSDELL
John Davis v. City of Andrews, TX, et al
as 19-50854
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY DE LA CRUZ and CITY OF ANDREWS, TEXAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVIS
Davis v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07345
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. f/k/a Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. City of Andrews, TX et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Defendant:
City of Andrews, TX and Anthony Delacruz
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LeFlore v. Mcnair et al
as 4:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
John LeFlore
Defendant:
Jameka Mcnair, Marshall Fisher, John Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
