Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Davis v. Hall et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Everett Matheney, Michael Wilson and Pelicia Hall
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laney v. Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Laney
Defendant:
Howard Charles Johnson, Robert Davis, Diakon Logisitics (Delaware) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Johnson v. Knize et al
as 3:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Gene Knize, Robert Davis and John Doe's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bd Aldermen Twn of Tutwiler MS v. State of MS, Off State Auditor, et al
as 17-60845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF TUTWILER, MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR, James Bobo, BO HOWARD, in his official capacity and ROBERT DAVIS, in his official capacity
Burgess v. Worley et al
as 4:2017cv00782
Defendant:
Carmen Rivera Worley, Gene Sera, Ashleigh Woodoll and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Earl Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Robert Davi
as 17-20677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Smith v. Davis
as 5:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Lawful Remedies et al
as 4:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
John Gregory Green
Defendant:
Lawful Remedies and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittinger v. The Davis Clinic et al
as 4:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Rittinger
Defendant:
The Davis Clinic, Robert Davis, John Primomo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01153
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
