Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sudduth v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2020cv00274
Defendant:
Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Draneka Q. Sudduth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2020cv02901
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Paula Y Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Deborah Nelson v. Megan Brennan
as 20-10739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deborah D. Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General
Wendy Carrizal v. Megan Brennan
as 20-50333
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY CARRIZAL
Ramon Jeanmarie v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 20-50334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON J. JEANMARIE
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner, U. S. Internal Revenue Service, MEGAN BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the United States and others
Dearing v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, The Great State of Mississippi c/o Jim Hood and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolores Machuca v. Megan Brennan
as 20-50193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOLORES MACHUCA
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer, United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
