Cases 21 - 30 of 6,930
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okorie v. University Mall, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
University Mall, LLC, Joseph R. Tullos, James Poncho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Decicco et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Jessica Lynn Cook, Law Office of Jessica Vicknair L L C, Lauren S Fellers and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Short Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McBride v. Collier
as 24-50274
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Johnson et al v. XYZ Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Johnson, Matthew Parker and Thomas Atkins, Sr.
Defendant:
XYZ Insurance Company, John Doe and Robert G. Goolsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID **TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN**
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Fredrick Fitzgerald Scott, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
