Cases 31 - 40 of 2,299
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Diaz v. Lumpkins
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
Nelson Diaz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bonita Nelson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Dr. Lanette Lithicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dedeaux v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
Hancock County, City of Bay St. Louis, MS, Anthony Gambino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Crotts v. Robinson
as 24-20014
Petitioner:
Alan Nelson Crotts
Respondent:
Reginald Robinson, Director of the Fort Bend Community Supervision and Corrections Department
Nelson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc and Unknown Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Crotts v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2023cv04828
Plaintiff:
Alan Nelson Crotts
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30923
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent:
Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Doplemore et al v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv07367
Plaintiff:
Algernon Doplemore and Diine Nelson
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company and Elizabeth Read
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
