Cases 31 - 40 of 930
Murray v. Calcasieu Corrections
as 3:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Bernie M. Murray
Defendant:
Calcasieu Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Murray
as 23-40274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Keith Anthony Murray
Murray v. River Hills CHM LLC
as 5:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Murray Meagan and Meagan Murray
Defendant:
River Hills CHM LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Williams v. L T C W et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Robert F Kennedy, Jr, Children's Health Defense, Connie Sampognaro and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H Murthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Erwin v. Murray et al
as 2:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
David Erwin
Defendant:
Don Murray and Gregory Champagne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Murray
as 23-10234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darrion Murray
Murray et al v. Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Patrick Murray and Cara Murray
Defendant:
Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Guillen v. Basse et al
as 4:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Guillen
Defendant:
David R. Basse, Gerald Buluti, Lannette Linthincum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
