Cases 31 - 40 of 239
Pettis v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2021cv04206
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Faye Pettis
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Epting v. Nodolf et al
as 7:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Garland Clifton Epting
Defendant:
Laura A. Nodolf, Weldon R. Petty, Rodney A. Satterwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Rush Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Charles Love
Defendant:
Rush Health Systems, Inc. doing business as Rush Foundation Hospital, MD George L. Petty and Unknown John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Petty et al
as 4:2021cv03836
Plaintiff:
Keith Martin
Defendant:
Aaron Petty and John Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty et al v. Dresser L L C et al
as 1:2021cv02586
Plaintiff:
Betsy E. Petty, Charles Baun, William Guyon and others
Defendant:
Dresser, LLC, Dresser RE, LLC, Baker Hughes Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Justin Wright v. Jane Doe et al
as 6:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Director, TDCJ State Classification Committee, Corr. Officer Patrice L. Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. King et al
as 4:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, Assistant Warden FNU Harris and Head Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Dr. Fryman et al
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Dr. Fryman and FMC-Carswell Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Pinnegle Point LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01390
Defendant:
Pinnegle Point LLC doing business as Pinnacle Point Food Mart and Kelechukwu Ukaumunna
Plaintiff:
Tina Petty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pettis v. Cain
as 21-60493
Petitioner / Appellant:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
