Cases 41 - 50 of 4,255
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mobery v. Sissytrunk
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Mobery
Defendant:
Brady Sissytrunk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magee et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Hope Magee and Matthew Harris
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Evans v. Bolin et al
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Reginald Evans
Defendant:
Operations Manager Nina Bolin, Operations Manager Linda M Pettillo, Linda Stacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-60201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Avdeef, et al., v. Cole, et al.
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Avdeef and Melissa Ann Avdeef
Defendant:
Lindsey Nicole Cole, The State of Texas, Department Family Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barkley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barkley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
