Cases 51 - 60 of 337
Mayes v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11440
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Sun Pharma Global FZE, Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tabitha L. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Mayes et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corr., Officer Martin Mayes and Ms. St. Pen.
Plaintiff:
Perez Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mayes v. Lincare Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00278
Defendant:
Fictitious Defendants, Patient Support Services, Inc. and Lincare Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Mayes et al
as 3:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corr., Officer Martin Mayes and Ms. St. Pen.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Perez Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Correct Care Solutions Medical Staff
as 1:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
David Todd Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Stephenson
as 1:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
David Todd Mayes
Defendant:
Zena Stepheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Mayes et al
as 1:2018cv00471
Defendant:
Tom Mayes and Patricia Oliver
Plaintiff:
Diane Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes v. Tolbert
as 1:2018cv00337
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mayes, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Curtis Mayes v. Bryan Williams, et al
as 18-50305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS MAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, Individual Capacity, Assistant Warden Connally Unit, M. BLALOCK, Individual Capacity, TDCJ Regional Director, SAMMY VALERO, Individual Capacity, Captain of Corrections, Connally Unit and others
Mayes v. Stepheson et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Todd Mayes
Defendant:
Zena Stepheson, FNU Turner, FNU Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
