Cases 61 - 70 of 1,056
Trackling v. Holmes
as 3:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Hollis et al
as 2:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
Glenda M Holmes
Defendant:
Dondria L Hollis, Dr. Michelle Cooper, Dr. Eillen S Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
JXN Undivided Coalition et al v. Tindell et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, People's Advocacy Institute and others
Defendant:
Sean Tindell and Bo Luckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Darlene Holmes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Holmes County
as 23-60277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelsey Wilborn, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Holmes County, Warden Barry Rule, Sheriff Willie March and others
Vanous v. King et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
Darious D. King, FNU Holmes and FNU Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant:
Robert M. White and Charles J. Ballay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miranda v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Domingo Miranda
Defendant:
Mr. Holmes, Mr. Flannel and Mr. Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wigley v. James V. Allred Unit
as 23-10226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy E. Wigley
Defendant / Appellee:
James V. Allred Unit, Andrea B. Lozada, James Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
