Cases 71 - 80 of 462
Vincent et al v. CRST Malone, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Leroy Jack Sullivan and CRST Malone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Myrna Barras Breaux, Delores Phelps and Zilda Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al
as 1:2020cv01176
Defendant:
Dell Medical Center at UT System, Washington Mutual Bank, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Saturn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rosario v. DHS US Immigration Service et al
as 1:2020cv00221
Defendant:
FNU Williams, FNU Allen, DHS US Immigration Service and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Wascom et al
as 2:2020cv02776
Defendant:
Warden Spinks, Warden Scott, Warden Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Teresa Malone
as 20-60901
Defendant / Appellant:
Teresa K. Malone
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Everett Arnold, et al v. Barbers Hill Independent Sch, et al
as 20-20488
Defendant / Appellant:
Mandy Malone, Clint Pipes, Doug Anderson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cindy Bradford
D & J Investments of Cenla L L C et al v. Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C et al
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
James A Methvin, Derrick J Malone, James W Greer, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC, GHD Services, Inc., Dresser RE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03099
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Lynn Craig Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv02148
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Paul Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
