Cases 71 - 80 of 875
Salinas v. Loud et al
as 4:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Cesar Salinas
Defendant:
Steve Loud and Teresa Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. "STG" Gang Intelligence et al
as 7:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Gabino Salinas
Defendant:
"STG" Gang Intelligence, Davite Flores and HCSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
as 7:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Humberto Salinas
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Salinas v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02921
Plaintiff:
Jaqueline Salinas
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Flood Insurance Act
Hernandez-Salinas v. Sanchez
as 2:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Hernandez-Salinas
Respondent:
Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Garcia, III
Defendant:
Senior Warden Bernadette Rodriguez, Assistant Warden T. Wiktorik, P. Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Rodriguez et al;
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Garcia, III
Defendant:
Senior Warden Bernadette Rodriguez, Assistant Warden T. Wiktorik, P. Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Busby et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Busby, Charlie Stroleny, Deputy Nowlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. "STG" Gang Intelligence et al
as 9:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Gabino Salinas
Defendant:
"STG" Gang Intelligence, Davite Flores and H.C.S.O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
