Cases 81 - 90 of 1,862
Ware v. Bishop et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Marquis Deyshaun Ware
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Tim Trawick and T. Polluck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reitz, et al., v. Meridian Security Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Tim Reitz and Francesca Reitz
Defendant:
Meridian Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Brooks v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Donald Brooks
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Ann-Marie Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Hooper
as 23-30782
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Anderson v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv06735
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anderson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Louisiana State
Respondent:
Louisiana State Attorney General's Office and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fillyaw v. Cmty Natl Bank & Trust
as 23-11118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saybree Rayshawn Fillyaw
Defendant / Appellee:
Community National Bank & Trust, Rachel Whisenant, Barbra Moe and others
Grandison v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv06613
Plaintiff:
Lance J. Grandison
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30752
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30749
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and State of Louisiana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
