Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Henry v. Rescu Foundation et al
as 3:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
Ann Henry
Defendant:
Rescu Foundation and Scarborough Renaissance Festival doing business as Scarborough Faire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gohmert v. Pence
as 21-40001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelli Ward, James R. Lamon, Jake Hoffman and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael R. Pence
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marian Sheridan, Michele Lundgren, Meshawn Maddock and others
Gohmert et al v. Pence
as 6:2020cv00660
Plaintiff:
Greg Safsten, Nancy Cottle, Michael Ward and others
Defendant:
Michael R. Pence
Intervenor Defendant:
Alan Hamilton Kennedy
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Meshawn Maddock, Amy Facchinello, Marian Sheridan and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Intervenor:
Mr. Timothy P Dowling and MIchele Lundgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Cormier, et al v. Lafayette City-Parish Con Govt, et al
as 11-31125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH BOWMAN CORMIER and MARY ANN HENRY CORMIER
Defendant - Appellant:
LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, NOLVEY STELLY, individually and HEATHER MARTIN, individually
Evans et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01272
Plaintiff:
Sean Evans , Mark Brimmer , Gilda Vera and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cormier et al vs. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bowman Cormier and Mary Ann Henry Cormier
Defendant:
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, City Police of Lafayette, City Prosecutors Office of Lafayette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt Refining Company v. Henry
as 1:2008cv00171
Plaintiff:
Hunt Refining Company
Defendant:
Elizabeth Ann Henry
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
