Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Forrest v. Doe
as 5:2026cv03033
Plaintiff:
Cameron Forrest
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tillery v. Warden, FCI Forrest City Medium
as 9:2026cv00599
Petitioner:
Johnathan Tillery
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Forrest City Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Forrest County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2026cv00095
Plaintiff:
Aaron Charles Tobias Harris
Defendant:
Forrest County Board of Supervisors, Nurse Sam Unknown and Corrections Officer Sgt. J-9
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bozeman v. Forrest General Hospital
as 2:2026cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bozeman
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walters v. FCA US, LLC
as 2:2026cv00090
Plaintiff:
Forrest D. Walters
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Neapollioun v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2026cv00081
Plaintiff:
Raju Neapollioun
Defendant:
Forrest County, Mississippi, Kelby Lewis and Omen Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 7:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Forrest Long
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dominguez v. Warden of BOP Forrest City FCI Medium
as 3:2026cv01463
Petitioner:
Joe Dominguez, Jr
Respondent:
Warden of BOP Forrest City FCI Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
