Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Queen v. Circuit Court of Jefferson County et al
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jerome Queen
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Jefferson County and Sheriff James Bailey
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Lonnie James Bailey, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Capps et al v. Henderson County et al
as 6:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
MD Robert Capps and RN Aily Hoang
Defendant:
Henderson County and James Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey et al v. G E I C O County Mutual Insurance Co et al
as 2:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
James Bailey and Donna Bailey
Defendant:
GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Sasha Stadium and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Brian Caubarreaux & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Arroyo et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Carol Arroyo , Kacey Adams , Leke Adewunmi and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv16108
Plaintiff:
James Bailey
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Director of TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
Lonnie James Bailey, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
James Bailey
Defendant:
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
