Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McGee v. Jones et al
as 3:2026cv00571
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea McGee
Defendant:
Marcus Jones, Darrel Vannoy, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nettles v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2026cv02106
Plaintiff:
Milton Wayne Nettles
Defendant:
Martin Gonzalez, John Doe 1-2, Judge Catherine Torres-Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Chitalian Pizzeria, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv02588
Plaintiff:
Alisha Crawford
Defendant:
Chitalian Pizzeria, LLC and Deallen J. Nettles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nettles v. USA
as 1:2025cv00119
Petitioner:
Jayma Edward Nettles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. City of Moss Point, Mississippi
as 1:2025cv00114
Plaintiff:
Toni Nettles Johnson
Defendant:
City of Moss Point, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prince v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Deedra Whitfield, Brandy McMullen, Eric Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brandon Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
