Cases 1 - 10 of 263
Quincy v. Hutson et al
as 2:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Gina Quincy
Defendant:
Susan Hutson, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roshell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daryl G. Roshell
Defendant:
Alice Washington, Unknown Roe, Unknown Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aucoin v. Aymond et al
as 6:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
David Aucoin
Defendant:
Quentin Aymond, Caleb Aymond, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Antwine Roe
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Stacie Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Russell et al
as 2:2023cv06982
Plaintiff:
Comelius Antwine Roe and Cornelius Antwine Roe
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Stacie Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Civita et al v. Profuture Holdings, LLC (TX) et al
as 4:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Roberto Civita, Ricardo Civita and Richard Civita
Defendant:
Profuture Holdings, LLC (TX), Profuture Holdings, LLC (OK), Profuture Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AKHTER et al v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
MOSAMMAT AKHTER, MOHAMMAD KARIM and JAWAD KARIM
Defendant:
JOHN PATRICK MOONEY, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Roe v. Patterson
as 23-40281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Roe
Defendant / Appellee:
Leighton Paige Patterson and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
