Cases 1 - 10 of 931
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Assurant American Security Insurance Company Global P&C Claims
as 2:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Randy Tucker
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc. v. Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc. v. Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Tucker Albin & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Star Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Tucker
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jimmy Tucker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Tucker v. Kroger Texas LP
as 3:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Nakia Tucker
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Caston v. Tucker
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Bernard B. Caston
Defendant:
Randy Tucker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dilworth v. Tucker
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dilworth
Defendant:
Landon Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ray v. Boone
as 24-40169
Plaintiff:
Masika Brown Ray
Defendant:
Anthony Boone, Chief, Maxey Cerliano, Sheriff, City of Longview, Texas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
