Cases 31 - 40 of 339
Fekety v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Linda Fekety
Defendant:
Wellpath, John J. Vargo, D.O., Deputy Hocevar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waddell et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Waddell and Matthew Miller
Defendant:
Randy Lewis, Village of Coal Grove, Jeff Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mekus v. Adams et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mekus
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Albert B. Chandler, III, Sherry Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Derrick Lewis v. Kingsport Police Department, et al
as 22-5665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LAMAR LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KINGSPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, BEN DEGREEN, Officer and others
Price v. Whitmer
as 2:2022cv11561
Plaintiff:
Curwood Lewis Price
Defendant:
Governor Gretchen Whitmer
Wolshlager v. Cotter et al
as 1:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
Doug Arthur Wolshlager
Defendant:
Art Cotter, Carmal R. Harlow, James Hall-Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Will McLemore, et al v. Roxana Gumucio, et al
as 22-5458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILL MCLEMORE, MCLEMORE AUCTION COMPANY, LLC, AARON MCKEE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROXANA GUMUCIO, GLENN KOPCHAK, JOHN THORPE and others
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Kendall et al
as 2:2022cv10958
Plaintiff:
Curwood Lewis Price
Defendant:
Sean Kendall and Elizabeth Hertel
Lewis v. Knight et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jr Basil Warren Lewis
Defendant:
Phil Knight, Owner Michael Jordan Brand and Designer Tinker Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
