Cases 81 - 90 of 895
Stapleton v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv12036
Plaintiff:
John J. Stapelton and John J. Stapleton
Defendant:
John Doe, Scott Kasper, Louise Schillinger and others
Tinsley v. Fox et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Tinsley
Defendant:
Det. T. Fox, B. Ward, L. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Bass v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2022cv11975
Plaintiff:
Troy Bass
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Williams
as 2:2022cv02538
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foreman v. Maddaloni
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P. Foreman and RESTRICTED FILER Benjamin Preston Foreman
Defendant:
Michael T. Maddaloni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Anderson v. Metro By T-Mobile et al
as 2:2022cv02523
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
Metro By T-Mobile, T-Mobile and its Affiliates and American Arbitration Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Howard Linden v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 22-1681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD T. LINDEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timesha Beauchamp
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, MICHAEL STORMS, SCOTT RICKARD and others
Cummins v. City of East Ridge et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Cummins and Ronald Alan Cummins
Defendant:
City of East Ridge, Tennessee, Candice Miller, Teddy Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2022cv11010
Plaintiff:
Monica L. Mendez
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Calvin v. Stark County et al
as 5:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Reverend Justin Calvin
Defendant:
Stark County, Kevin L. Sedares, Joe Pillegi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
