Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Carr v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2020cv00818
Defendant:
James Hellinger, Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville and others
Plaintiff:
Johnetta Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. CMH Transport, Inc (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00506
Defendant:
CMH Transport, Inc
Plaintiff:
Tina Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Greene County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Deputy William G Carr, Jr., Sheriff Wesley Holt and Greene County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Royal v. Detroit Public Schools Community District et al
as 2:2020cv11947
Plaintiff:
Autumn Carr, Tevares Jenkins, Famika Edmond and others
Defendant:
Nikolai Vitti and Detroit Public Schools Community District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Butler et al v. Smith County Board of Education et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Smith County Board of Education, Barry H. Smith, Dusty Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Sharona Carr, Jason Carr and Kelly Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Ramos et al
as 3:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Estate of Izeyha Carr, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, John and/or Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Barley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Southfield, City of et al
as 5:2019cv11726
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, James Craig, Southfield Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
