Cases 21 - 30 of 1,108
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Morgan v. Hopkinsville Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Morgan
Defendant:
Hopkinsville Police Department, Major Ceasar Sierra, Captain Todd DeArmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cunegin v. Keller et al
as 2:2024cv10135
Plaintiff:
Bobbie J. Cunegin
Defendant:
J. Keller, K. Demeter, Rollet Raymond and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gallagher et al v. Grand Traverse, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
James K. Gallagher, Chazz McCall and James Gallagher
Defendant:
Grand Traverse, County of and Long Lake, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
