Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Kimberly Diei v. Randy Boyd, et al
as 23-5771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY DIEI
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY BOYD, in his individual and official capacity as President of the Univeristy of Tennessee System, CHRISTA GEORGE, in her individual and official capacity as Chair of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy's Professional Conduct Committee, BRAD BOX and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Compton v. Laing et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Joseph David Compton
Defendant:
Officer Kyle J. Laing, Bowling Green Police Department and Warren County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diei v. Boyd et al
as 2:2021cv02071
Defendant:
Charles Hatcher, Decosta Jenkins, Jamie Woodson and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Diei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flood v. Boyd et al (TV2)
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Ryan Stinnett, John Compton and Randy Boyd
Plaintiff:
David R Flood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buckley v. City of Westland et al
as 2:2020cv11315
Defendant:
James Starks, Jason Neville, Jason Blanchard and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. Louisville Metropolitan Government et al
as 3:2019cv00348
Defendant:
Raymond Wonka and Louisville Metropolitan Government
Plaintiff:
Jason Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Westland, City of et al
as 4:2018cv14057
Defendant:
Officer Monson, Officer Gomez, Lt. Novakowski and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
