Cases 11 - 20 of 437
Martin v. Lincoln County Jail
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley Martin
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Lincoln County Jail Administration, Lincoln County Jail Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lt. Ashley Marsh, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence Jenkins v. Aspirus Eye Clinic, et al
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JENKINS
Defendant:
ASPIRUS EYE CLINIC and DOCTOR SHALEN JOHNSON
Jenkins v. Witworth et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Jenkins
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Witworth, (f/n/u) Cane, (f/n/u) Eads and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv13188
Plaintiff:
Daniel Antaun Jenkins
Defendant:
Pamela Young, Valerie Miller, Heather Zimmermann and others
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jenkins v. USA
as 2:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Brandon M. Jenkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hurdle v. Jenkins
as 2:2024cv02013
Petitioner:
Devontez Hurdle
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins #962092 v. Aspirus Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jenkins #962092
Defendant:
Aspirus Eye Clinic and Shalen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
