Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Jackson #381114 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, L. Parish, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamar Jackson #381114
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Pouperd et al
as 3:2020cv02424
Defendant:
IIS Jenkins, Corrections Officer Ford, Corrections Officer Mark Pouperd and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Drewery et al
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Kersey, Phil Drewery, Jr., Jason Drewery and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Shotwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Well Path Medical Service
as 3:2019cv00543
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lee Brown
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Service, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkhub v. Louisville County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00101
Defendant:
John Doe#1, John Doe#4, Lucas County Jail & Detention and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Hamdan Alkhub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Resch v. Municipality of Macomb County et al
as 2:2018cv13607
Defendant:
Anthony Wickersham, Jane Doe 1, Municipality of Macomb County and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resch
Hadnot v. Farrow et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hadnot
Defendant:
Eric Farrow, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
