Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Ray v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2016cv02726
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, f/n/u Rivers and f/n/u Angel
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Rivers v. DeWayne Burton
as 16-2108
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY RIVERS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEWAYNE BURTON
Damien Sublett v. Alan Brown, et al
as 16-5441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN BROWN, Warden at Green River Correctional Complex, CASEY FOSTER, Sergeant at Green River Correctional Complex, COURTNEY BRADLEY, Nurse and others
Damien Sublett v. Alan Brown, et al
as 16-5408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN SUBLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN BROWN, Warden at Green River Correctional Complex, CASEY FOSTER, Sergeant at Green River Correctional Complex, CORTNEY BRADLY, Nurse and others
Osborne v. Westbrook et al
as 3:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Osborne
Defendant:
f/n/u Westbrook and TDOC River Bend Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Paris et al (ASH)
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Rivers
Defendant:
Mike Paris, David Abel, Jason Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Valaluka et al
as 1:2015cv01935
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and River Silverbear
Defendant:
Kristin Valaluka, Allegheny County Jail Cashier, Orlando Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers #171040 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Robert Rivers #171040
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, Unknown Ehle and Unknown Hursh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Rivers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rivers v. Turner et al
as 3:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Doylan V. Rivers
Defendant:
Neil Turner, F.N.U. Hunt, F.N.U. Shaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
