Cases 41 - 50 of 548
Solomon v. USA
as 6:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Patricia Ann Solomon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Leach v. McCracken Co. Jail Medical Staff
as 5:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davie Ann Leach
Defendant:
McCracken Co. Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Bowens et al
as 3:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Lezzerio Howard
Defendant:
Daphne Bowens and Lee Ann Hamblin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Altantawi v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2022cv11906
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Altantawi
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Vicki Warren, Shane Gibson and others
James Miller v. John Davids, et al
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, in their individual and official capacities and others
Michael et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Muskegon, County of, Michael Poulin and others
Plaintiff:
Gracie Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fester v. Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Cynthia Ann Fester
Respondent:
Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women and Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cedeno v. Friedman et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Defendant:
Stuart A Friedman, Ronnie Ducoff, Timothy J. McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
