Cases 41 - 50 of 212
Daniel Cook v. Erica Huss, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, ERICA HUSS, ROBERT VASHAW, Deputy Warden and others
Sublett v. Pucket et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Damien A. Sublett
Defendant:
Joyce Pucket, Dr. K. Smith, L. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell-Feazell v. Campbell County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Cregg Mitchell-Feazell
Defendant:
Campbell County Jail, Stoney Love, Mallory Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2022cv10580
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Hale
Defendant:
Michael Bouchard, Well Path Health Care, Craig Diamond and others
Robinson v. Well Path et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Cameron Robinson
Defendant:
Well Path, Lieutenant f/n/u Slusher, Metro Government of Nashville and Davidson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Conyers Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rashada #493950 v. Sheldon et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Webster Rashada #493950
Defendant:
Unknown Sheldon, Unknown Burggren, Unknown Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Luve et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Travis M Robertson
Defendant:
Stoney Luve, Sgt. Katie Wilson, Lt. Mallory Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Lee
as 2:2021cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Andrew Sidney Phillips, Samuel Matthews and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
