Cases 1 - 10 of 412
Norman Pryor v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3301
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director of ODRC, In their individual and official capacity, LIEUTINENT ARIANNA BROCK, In their individual and official capacity, M. DARKANGELO, Mental Health Administrator, In their individual and official capacity and others
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keith Durr v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1253
Plaintiff:
KEITH LARON DURR
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, WARREN C. EVANS, Wayne County Executive and KYM L. WORTHY, Wayne County Prosecutor
Peterson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
DeAndrey Peterson
Defendant:
Steven Wright, Hannah Evans, J Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv10724
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Steward Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel Evans, Robert M. Hayes, Robert Mendham and others
Taylor v. Oakes et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daren M Taylor
Defendant:
Stacy Oakes, Michael Parris and Brandon Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hensley et al
as 0:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Evan M. White
Defendant:
Jailer William D. Hensley, Nurse Trish Unknown and Boyd County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #770290 v. Ordiway et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Evans #770290
Defendant:
P. Ordiway and Unknown Tamlyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
