Cases 1 - 10 of 351
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stampone #713769 v. Parnall Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Parnall Correctional Facility, Noah Nagy, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Casey et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Frederick Matthews
Defendant:
Jim Casey, Stacy Oaks, William Blackerby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon #158463 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lamar Dixon #158463
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Randee Rewerts, Unknown Hitchingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Henderson County et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Frederick, Jr.
Defendant:
Henderson County, Zachery Ortis and Austin Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Defendant:
Julie Lynch, FREDERICK D. BENTON, CORY D. HELFFRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Defendant:
TDOC, Jerrie Avery, Anna Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
