Cases 91 - 100 of 206
Edward Wilcox v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 15-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD , MI, BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC , Kevin Corbett and Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wilcox v. USA
as 2:2015cv00074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dustin Patrick Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Steven Wilcox v. Amanda Terpening, et al
as 14-2136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN JON WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA MARIE TERPENING, MICHAEL AARON TERPENING, JAMES G. FROOK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steven Wilcox v. Charles Spiekerman, et al
as 14-2113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN JON WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES H. SPIEKERMAN, NANCY K. SPIEKERMAN, aka Nancy K. Spiekerman, PEDRO QUEZADA and others
Salehe et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sam Salehe , Juan Aponte , Nathan Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
