Cases 101 - 110 of 128
Riddle #180984 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcel Riddle #180984
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Jeffrey Woods, Lou Berlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Atterberry et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12682
Plaintiff:
William Spencer
Defendant:
James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios, Patricia Caruso and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv12587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Fountain Industries Company
as 3:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
Clint P Davis
Defendant:
Fountain Industries Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Fountain Brook, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02337
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Fountain Brook, LLC and William R. Hyneman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
E Beats Music et al v. Joe H Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02787
Plaintiff:
E Beats Music, Rap Tracks Publishing, Robert Lamm doing business as Lamminations Music and others
Defendant:
Joe H, Inc. and Joseph Harper
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Malone #197567 v. Theut et al
as 2:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Donald Malone #197567
Defendant:
David Theut, Clarence Hassel, Richard B. Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Clark v. Stephen Murphy, et al
as 09-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, JULIE A. BECK, KAREN M. GIBBS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00504
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Ross et al v. Cincinnati, City of et al
as 1:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Ross, Stephen H. Dapper, Daniel P. Regenold and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati, City of, Cincinnati Center City Development Corporation, Fountain Square Management Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
