Cases 111 - 120 of 2,388
King v. C.R. BARD,INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02820
Plaintiff:
Dan King
Defendant:
C.R. BARD,INC. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Henry Ford Health System
as 2:2023cv11993
Plaintiff:
David King
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System
Interested Party:
Briana Tabbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Walker #747025 v. King
as 1:2023cv00782
Petitioner:
Larry Walker #747025
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
Daaron Edward King
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrison et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald Morrison, Peter Shaw, Douglas Berhns and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jamey Lanahan, et al v. Regions Bank, et al
as 23-5729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEY LANAHAN and LORI LANAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIONS BANK, REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, TENNESSEE TITLE SERVICES, LLC and others
Kelsey King v. Nathaniel Shoate, et al
as 23-5679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELSEY JEAN KING
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL SHOATE, SCOTT CORNELSON and ROBERT POMEROY
USA v. Earl King
as 23-3709
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EARL KING
Denzel Simmons v. Shawn Brewer, et al
as 23-1638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENZEL ARTHUR SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHAWN BREWER, official and personal capacity, WARDEN A. STEWART, official and personal capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN K. LINDSEY, official and personal capacity and others
King v. City of Detroit
as 5:2023cv11558
Plaintiff:
AMEER KING
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Transportation and DETROIT CITY OF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
