Cases 11 - 20 of 546
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arciaga v. Gulf Harbor Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Emilita T. Arciaga
Defendant:
Gulf Harbor Investment Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Ross v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Grand Rapids, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donna Dickinson v. Wilson County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 24-5005
Plaintiff:
DONNA DICKINSON
Defendant:
WILSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOSEPH PIERCE, in his individual capacity and WILSON COUNTY, TN
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierce et al v. Premier Health Partners
as 3:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gloria Pierce, Christine Hughes and Michael Finley
Defendant:
Premier Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Lyman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv10024
Plaintiff:
David Lyman, Timothy Thuering, Vincent Brady and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
William Washington, Jr.In re: William Washington, Jr.
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM PIERCE WASHINGTON, JR.
Pierce v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cornelius D. Pierce
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, Darron Hall, Carla Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Pierce v. Williams, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, SERGEANT . BURLERSON, OFFICER SMOLINSKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
